Do YP in care have different aspirations for their future?

care
aspirations
school leavers
Author

Hertfordshire Public Health Evidence and Intelligence

Published

June 15, 2023

Abstract

Young people in foster or residential care (care-experienced children and young people (CYP)) face different lived experiences than those from non-care homes. This could influence their decision-making around aspirations after leaving school, such as their career, education, or training. This brief analysis seeks to ascertain whether a student’s care status has a relationship with their aspirations after school.

In the data collected for the latest YPHWS cohort, there were 255 students out of a total of 11151 students who are care-experienced CYPs, representing 2.3% of the total student population.

Here, we identify that the students being looked after status has a very statistically significant relationship with continuing education, but with no statistical significance with any of the other pathways after school.

Methods

One of the questions coded in the YPHWS survey is what do you plan to do as a next step after leaving school? This is a multi-factorial answer, where students can respond either yes, no, or maybe to several options:

  • Education

  • Job

  • Training

  • Family

  • Uncertain

  • Other

We performed a chi-squared test for each of the different prospects questions on the tables below for each of the responses, along with their relative proportions. The chi-squared test tests statistical significance of the association between students’ care-experienced status and their responses to different pathways after school.

Note, these numbers have been suppressed to the nearest 5 to prevent disclosure, but the actual chi-squared tests have been performed on the raw numbers.


More on chi-squared tests

We can put the results of students answering the question in YPHWS in a contingency table, which tallies the responses into a table like:

Care-experienced Maybe No Yes
Yes
Maybe
No

With contingency tables, we can perform chi-square tests, which examines whether the categories of the rows and columns of a contingency table are statistically significantly associated.

The chi-squared test compares the observed frequencies from the data with expected frequencies if there were null or no relationship between the variables.

With chi-squared tests, we need sufficient size in each of the cells inside the table. While the number of students not care-experienced outnumber the number of students who answered prefer not to say or yes, there are still sufficient numbers to perform the test (>5) in each of the responses.

After the critical chi-squared test value is calculated, we then use the degrees of freedom to match the results on a distribution table with a significance threshold to determine statistical significance, usually set at 0.05. More about chi-squared tests can be found at: BMJ - The Chi squared tests

Students answering prefer not to say were omitted from the test.

Results

Table 1: Statistical Significance of Aspirational Pathways After School for Care-experienced Status in Students

(a) Summary Table of Aspirational Pathways
education job training family unsure other

Education

Table 2: Plan to continue in education after leaving school

(a) Numbers (suppressed)
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 2420 580 6600
Yes 50 40 125
(b) Percentages
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 25% 6% 69%
Yes 23% 19% 58%
(c) Results
Significance
very statistically significant

Figure 1: Normalised bar graph showing proportion of answers for care-experienced students and non care-experienced students on continuing education after leaving school

Job/career

Table 3: Plan to get a job after leaving school

(a) Numbers (suppressed)
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 2775 770 5800
Yes 70 25 120
(b) Percentages
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 30% 8% 62%
Yes 33% 12% 56%
(c) Results
Significance
not statistically significant

Training

Table 4: Plan to train for a skilled job after leaving school

(a) Numbers (suppressed)
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 3925 2095 3015
Yes 85 60 65
(b) Percentages
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 43% 23% 33%
Yes 40% 29% 31%
(c) Results
Significance
not statistically significant

Family

Table 5: Plan to start a family after leaving school

(a) Numbers (suppressed)
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 3095 3675 1675
Yes 65 90 45
(b) Percentages
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 37% 44% 20%
Yes 32% 45% 22%
(c) Results
Significance
not statistically significant

Uncertain

Table 6: Aren’t sure what they want to do after leaving school

(a) Numbers (suppressed)
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 2380 3630 2645
Yes 50 95 55
(b) Percentages
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 27% 42% 31%
Yes 25% 48% 28%
(c) Results
Significance
not statistically significant

Other

Table 7: Have other plans after leaving school

(a) Numbers (suppressed)
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 3095 3675 1675
Yes 65 90 45
(b) Percentages
care-experienced Maybe No Yes
No 37% 44% 20%
Yes 32% 45% 22%
(c) Results
Significance
not statistically significant

Conclusions/implications

Here, we identify that the students being looked after status has a very statistically significant effect with continuing education, and no significance with any other pathway after leaving school.

Despite only having one pathway with statistical significance, this is noteworthy in that it can provide carers, teachers, and others involved in the health and wellbeing of care-experienced CYPs an avenue in monitoring potential shortcomings of a care-experienced CYP’s potential. Further educational pursuits after school are highly associated with better health outcomes, lower deprivation, and higher earnings potential in adulthood. Reducing these inequities to access to higher education or other further educational pursuits is a key element to public health policy.

More on the results


Below shows the chi-square tests applied to the contingency tables collated together:

question x^2 p.value
education 51.56 0.00
job 4.46 0.11
training 2.62 0.27
family 2.01 0.37
unsure 1.69 0.43
other 2.01 0.37

A p.value of less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance, and that there is a relationship between the student’s status of being looked after and the specific prospect response.

A chi-squared test is a simple nonparametric test which only tells us of an association if statistical significance is found. Further analyses can be performed to elucidate further details on how or why the relationship between a children being looked after affects their prospective choices after education, but these are beyond the scope of this report.